Which of the following reasons supports assigning security rights to roles instead of individual users?

Assigning security rights to roles instead of individual users is advantageous because roles facilitate broader control over user access in a more efficient and organized manner. When permissions are assigned to roles, any user who is part of that role inherits those permissions, allowing for easier management of access rights across multiple users who share similar responsibilities or needs.

This approach streamlines the administration process, especially in larger organizations, as it reduces the complexity involved in managing individual permissions for every single user. Administrators can make bulk changes to access rights by modifying the role itself rather than having to adjust settings for each user individually, which saves time and minimizes the risk of error.

Additionally, roles can be structured to reflect the organization’s hierarchy or function, ensuring that all users with similar job functions have consistent access rights. This consistency is key for maintaining both security and operational efficiency. Using roles thus enhances the scalability of security management as new users can easily be assigned to a role rather than having to define their permissions from scratch.

In contrast, assigning permissions to individual users can lead to a complicated and cumbersome system that is difficult to manage, making it challenging to keep track of who has access to what, especially as the number of users increases.