Which statement describes the Stable Dependencies Principle?

The Stable Dependencies Principle emphasizes that code should have dependencies that are aligned with the stability of the various components. When a module depends on other modules, it should favor dependencies on components that are more stable as opposed to those that are less stable. This approach minimizes the risk of frequent changes cascading through the system, which can lead to maintenance challenges and increased complexity. By directing dependencies towards stability, developers can ensure that changes in less stable components do not require widespread modifications in more stable components, promoting a more resilient architecture.

The other statements, while related to software design principles, do not capture the essence of the Stable Dependencies Principle. The first statement discusses abstraction and stability, but doesn't directly address dependency direction. The second one refers to the granularity of reuse and release, which is a different concern regarding module design. The third statement focuses on how classes within a module should be grouped but doesn't touch on dependencies and stability. Each of these alternatives addresses some aspect of modular design but not the specific emphasis that the Stable Dependencies Principle places on the direction of dependencies.